____________________________________________________

                        THE GOSPEL OBSERVER

   "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations...teaching
   them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you
     always, even to the end of the age" (Matthew 28:19,20).
       ____________________________________________________

                           June 18, 2000
       ____________________________________________________

                    In Defense of Discrimination
                        by Andy Diestelkamp

          Many today have a misinformed view of what has been 
     called the separation of church and state. The modern 
     application of that phrase has been to ``protect'' the 
     political process from the influence of spiritual ideas and 
     values. Some would prefer that the moral beliefs of the 
     governed not be allowed to affect the government. The 
     founders of this nation made it abundantly clear that this
     was not their intent.

          Thomas Jefferson, in his first inaugural address, said, 
     ``May that Infinite Power which rules the destinies of the 
     universe lead our councils to what is best, and give them a 
     favorable issue for your peace and prosperity.'' In his 
     second inaugural address he expressed his need for ``the 
     favor of that Being in whose hands we are, who led our 
     forefathers, as Israel of old, from their native land and to 
     whose goodness I ask you to join with me in supplications, 
     that He will so enlighten the minds of your servants, guide 
     their councils, and prosper their measures.''

          Still, many today will try to insist that ``religious'' 
     types should stay out of politics and go back to their 
     pulpits. Are ``political'' types willing to stay out of spiritual 
     and moral matters? I think not, nor should they. Law 
     making without moral foundation results in bad law. 
     Likewise, preaching which does not address immorality is 
     impotent.

          Recently the Illinois House attempted to amend its 
     Human Rights Act to make it unlawful to discriminate against 
     a person because of his or her ``sexual orientation.'' The bill 
     had bi-partisan support and was narrowly defeated. Similar 
     bills will be introduced in each state.  Thus, I would like to 
     offer a few words on behalf of discrimination.  
     Discrimination has taken on an exclusively ugly connotation 
     in our culture. ``Discrimination is bad,'' we are told.

          To discriminate is simply to distinguish or 
     differentiate. We do this all the time and often for good 
     reason. An inability to discriminate is an inability to 
     appreciate. When one cannot discriminate between good and 
     evil, amorality exists. ``Woe to those who call evil good, and 
     good evil; who put darkness for light, and light for 
     darkness; who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!'' 
     (Isa. 5:20). In other words, woe to those who cannot 
     discriminate.

          The Illinois bill seeks to end discrimination on the 
     basis of ``sexual orientation,'' or so it says. It reads,
     ```Sexual orientation' means having or being perceived as 
     having an emotional, physical, or sexual attraction to 
     another person without regard to the sex of that person or 
     having or being perceived as having an orientation for such 
     attraction, or having or being perceived as having a 
     self-image or identity not traditionally associated with ones 
     biological maleness or femaleness.''

          I am amused by those who complain that we can't 
     understand the Bible, but then write the nonsense just 
     quoted. ``Sexual orientation'' according to the bill simply 
     means sexual deviancy. The sexually immoral have cowed 
     many politicians and now want to intimidate the rest of us 
     with the force of law to accept their deviant ``lifestyles'' on 
     all levels.  It does not want us to discriminate on the basis 
     of sexual deviancy.

          Are we to believe that marriage as ordained by God 
     between a male and a female (Gen. 2:22-24; Matt. 19:4-6) is 
     merely a tradition to which there are legitimate alternative 
     ``sexual orientations''? Scripture does not endorse such an
     indiscriminate view of sexual morality. Society's acceptance 
     and protection of sexual deviancy devalues the God-designed 
     family and destabilizes its position as the moral foundation 
     of communities.

          Just because lawmakers and even religious leaders 
     have bought and sold immorality under the banner of ``love'' 
     doesn't mean they do so with God's support. Murderers, 
     thieves, liars and others have often attempted to justify 
     their sins by pointing to love as their motivation.  It is no 
     surprise that the sexually deviant do likewise. True love 
     does not tolerate immorality, but calls for change in heart 
     and action.  True love promotes good over evil and can 
     discriminate between the two.

          What I found particularly interesting about the Illinois 
     bill (HB 0474) is that it blatantly discriminates in its 
     definition of ``sexual orientation.'' The last sentence of its 
     definition says, ```Sexual orientation' does not include a 
     physical or sexual attraction to a minor by an adult.'' In 
     other words, the law allows discrimination against
     pedophiles. How intolerant! The law is very discriminatory in 
     which sexual deviancies it will protect and which it will not.  
     Perhaps in a few years another house bill will amend the 
     Illinois Human Rights Act by dropping that one sentence.

          Remember, ``Marriage is honorable among all, and the 
     bed undefiled; but fornicators and adulterers God will 
     judge'' (Heb. 13:4). ``Do you not know that the unrighteous 
     will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. 
     Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor 
     homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor 
     drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the 
     kingdom of God'' (1 Cor. 6:9,10). The truth of Romans 1:18-32 
     is unfolding before our eyes in this country. Beware! 

          -- Via Think on These Things, April-May-June, 1999
          ___________________________________________

                        The Collection
                        by Tom Edwards

          I read recently of a young boy who was sent to 
     church with some money to put into the collection plate. 
     When he had returned home, his mother soon found out that 
     he had used that money to buy candy instead. Displeased 
     with what he had done, his mother rhetorically asked, ``Son, 
     weren't you supposed to put that money in the collection 
     plate?'' To this, the small boy replied, ``I didn't need to. I 
     met the preacher at the door, and he got me in for free!''

          Our young person in the above illustration certainly 
     had a misconception about the purpose for giving; and, sad 
     to say, there are many other people who also have wrong 
     ideas as to how the Lord's money is to be used today. Some, 
     for example, feel comfortable with seeing it used for social 
     and recreational activities, sponsored by the church.  The 
     building of gymnasiums, putting in basketball courts and 
     pool tables, building kitchens and fellowship halls for 
     banquets are not uncommon for some churches to do in our 
     time. In these cases, however, they would be similar to the 
     boy above; but, though, they would give into the collection, 
     they would then turn around and take some back out to
     buy their ``candy.''

          Instead, however, of using the Lord's money for just 
     anything we assume is a ``good work,'' we must look to the 
     Scriptures to see what that good work would be. For as 
     Paul told Timothy, ``All scripture is given by inspiration of 
     God...That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly 
     furnished unto all good works'' (2 Tim. 3:16,17). 
     Consequently, if God's word doesn't authorize it, then it 
     can't be a ``good work'' for the church to do.

          The work of the church involves evangelism, 
     edification, and helping needy saints. To use ``gimmicks'' to 
     try to accomplish these things, such as thinking that ``a 
     recreational center might bring more people in,'' does not 
     justify it. For before any expedient to promote the work of 
     the Lord can be used, it must first be lawful--scripturally.  
     To use the Lord's money for anything which is not 
     authorized is, therefore, a misuse.

          People need to know that there is a distinction
     between what one can do with his money and what the 
     Lord's money can be used for. For instance, if I want to 
     treat a dozen people to ice cream, I can do that with my 
     own money; but when I give that money to the Lord (in the 
     collection), it then becomes His and can be used only for 
     that which He authorizes--and an ice cream social sponsored 
     by the church is certainly not one of them.

          Another perversion of the collection today, among 
     many denominations, is the practice of tithing, which they 
     teach as a commandment of God for our time--and, therefore, 
     a necessity. A ``tithe,'' which literally means a ``tenth,'' 
     would be 10% of a person's income that is to be given to 
     the Lord; and any amount given above this 10% is sometimes 
     referred to as a ``love offering,'' by many of our 
     denominational friends, ``a giving beyond that which the 
     Lord demands.''

          Though Jesus taught the need for tithing during the 
     Mosaical Age (Matt. 23:23), people today need to realize that 
     it--along with the other Mosaical laws--was nailed to the
     cross and, thus, abolished for the Gospel Age in which we 
     live (Col. 2:14; Eph. 2:15,16). Furthermore, to try to seek 
     justification through the Law of Moses would cause one to 
     become ``severed from Christ,'' ``fallen from grace,'' and to 
     make the Lord of no effect or benefit in one's life (Gal. 
     5:1-4).

          Rather than commanded a certain percent, as a tithe, 
     the Christian is to give ''...as he has purposed in his heart; 
     not grudgingly or under compulsion; for God loves a 
     cheerful giver'' (2 Cor. 9:7). The amount given, therefore, is 
     between the giver and the Lord. The giver gives as he has 
     been prospered, and this might be 10%; but, if so, it is to 
     be mere coincidental and not because of the tithe of the Old 
     Testament law. For though tithing is not commanded today, 
     giving is; and when it comes to the collection, we are to lay 
     by in store on the first day of the week, Sunday, in order 
     that there will be a treasury that can be used to facilitate 
     the contributions for the work of the Lord (1 Cor. 16:1-3).

          We can be very thankful in our giving, in view of
     what God has given to us--not 10%, 20%, or 30% of His Son, 
     but ALL of Jesus came to this world to pave a way that 
     leads to our eternal salvation by His obedient life, His 
     sacrificial death, and His glorious resurrection. Surely, there 
     is no way we could ever return to God, through our giving, 
     all that He truly deserves. For His great offering--as well 
     as the eternal bliss to which it leads--is worth more than 
     all the treasures in the universe!

          In promoting the work of the Lord, let us, therefore, 
     learn to give in the manner and for the purposes that God 
     has commanded--for it is simply the right thing to do.
          ___________________________________________

                   Was Paul Crucified For You?

          In order to show the folly of following men in religion 
     instead of Jesus Christ, the apostle Paul asked the following 
     questions: ``Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? 
     Were you baptized in the name of Paul?'' Give some thought 
     to one of these questions.

          ``Was Paul crucified for you?'' Was Paul tried before 
     Pilate, mocked by the soldiers, spit upon by the multitude, 
     nailed to the cross of Golgotha, and was he the one to bear 
     on the cross the sins of the human family? If not, why wear 
     his name in religion? This is the point of Paul's argument.

          Why the people would ignore the name of Jesus Christ 
     and insist on wearing a human name was, no doubt, difficult 
     for Paul to understand.  And it is likewise hard to 
     understand why men today will wear the name of a man, or 
     some religious practice, knowing full well that it was Christ 
     who was crucified for them.

          Friend, if you are wearing a religious name that is 
     not found in the New Testament and, therefore, does not 
     give honor to the Christ, please carefully consider and give 
     serious thought to Paul's question.

                                            -- Selected
          ___________________________________________

                         NEWS & NOTES

          Jo Ann Wilson, a nurse from Louisville who visited 
     with us recently, is now undergoing testing for a severe 
     case of anemia, which she has had for the last few weeks. 
     Though received a blood transfusion, she still remains too ill 
     to return to work. Let us pray for a speedy and complete 
     recovery.

          Free Bible courses are available upon request.

          We welcome those of you who are visiting with us this 
     day.  Please come again!
             ________________________________________
                            Avondale                            
                        CHURCH OF CHRIST
                          P.O. Box 421                         
            1606 Glen Willow Rd., Avondale, PA  19311 
                         (610) 268-2088       
                  Sunday: 10:00 A.M. Bible class
                          11:00 A.M. Worship                     
                           6:00 P.M. Worship                     
                Wednesday: 7:00 P.M. Bible study
        evangelist/editor: Tom Edwards (610) 925-3567
                   e-mail: tedwards@zoomnet.net
 Gospel Observer web site: http://www.zoomnet.net/~tedwards/go
             ________________________________________