____________________________________________________

                        THE GOSPEL OBSERVER
       ____________________________________________________

   "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations...teaching
   them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you
     always, even to the end of the age" (Matthew 28:19,20).
       ____________________________________________________

                           March 6, 2005
       ____________________________________________________


                   Was Jesus Literally Forsaken?
                            by Doy Moyer

         Did the Father literally forsake Jesus at the cross? The 
    Aramaic phrase spoken by Jesus on the cross, translated "My 
    God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?" is often taken to mean 
    just that (Matt. 27:46). Generally, the idea is that since 
    Jesus was made to be sin on our behalf (2 Cor. 5:21), then it 
    was necessary for Him to suffer a form of spiritual death -- 
    separation from the Father. This was the penalty paid by Jesus. 
    Proof of this is seen in the phrase under question, along with 
    2 Corinthians 5:21.

         Granted, a brief look at the phrase, spoken at that 
    particular time, lends itself to the conclusion that Jesus 
    really was forsaken by the Father. It perhaps makes sense to 
    think that the penalty Jesus had to pay on our behalf is a 
    temporary spiritual separation from the Father. So we reason. 
    But this conclusion is really based upon two things: 1) the 
    phrase under question, and 2) our own reasoning and speculation 
    as to how Jesus bore our sins. Other than this, the Bible 
    nowhere says in any explicit sense that Jesus was forsaken. I 
    believe it is just the opposite.

         My conviction is that Jesus was not literally forsaken by 
    the Father as He was on the cross. I want to list a few items 
    that ought to be considered in coming to a conclusion about 
    this issue. As I do this, I realize that not every question can 
    be answered. I do not pretend to know or understand everything 
    that happened between Jesus and the Father. All of the workings 
    of deity are not made known to us; and we should be very 
    careful about speculating about these things (e.g., saying that 
    the 3-hour darkness must have signified God's withdrawal of 
    fellowship from Jesus; such is pure speculation). I think we 
    can consider a few points about this, and even give some 
    thought as to how this has any application to us. So, here 
    goes.

         1. The consequence of the position is not very attractive. 
    Think about it. Jesus came to do the will of the Father, which 
    involved His suffering and death on the cross (Heb. 10:5-10). 
    Jesus carried out the Father's will with absolute perfection. 
    Not a single instance of sin can be named in His life. And in 
    the context of speaking about His death, Jesus said, "And He 
    who sent Me is with Me; He has not left Me alone, for I always 
    do the things that are pleasing to Him" (Jn. 8:29). Now if the 
    Father did actually forsake Jesus on the cross, then this means 
    that it is possible for God to forsake one who has done 
    everything asked of him. That's not a very pleasant thought; I 
    don't think we can afford to think of God in this way. If God 
    the Father could forsake One who never sinned, what about those 
    of us who have sinned and been forgiven? This does not prove 
    the case, but it is a consequence to be reckoned with.

         2. Paying the price for our sins did not necessitate 
    spiritual separation of the Father and the Son. In response to 
    the first point, someone might think, "But Jesus was paying the 
    price for sin; doesn't that change things?" The question is, 
    did Jesus become guilty of those sins, or was he paying a 
    redemptive price for the sins? If He became guilty of the sins, 
    then yes, separation from the Father would have occurred. But 
    if not, and He was simply paying a price of redemption, then 
    spiritual separation was not necessary.

         In paying the price for our sins, Jesus did for us what we 
    could not do for ourselves. If the price was temporary 
    separation from the Father, then the sacrifice only did what we 
    all have already experienced. Since all have sinned, all have 
    been spiritually separated from God. If Jesus came to do that, 
    then He only experienced what we have already suffered. It 
    should be obvious that Jesus did not pay for sins in the way I 
    would have had to pay for those sins myself. Thus, the price 
    Jesus paid was not:

         a. Temporary separation. We've already suffered that. If 
    this is the sacrifice made by Jesus, then we have already paid 
    the price.

         b. Eternal separation. That's obvious enough, since Jesus 
    is in heaven (Col. 3:1). But if He died separated from the 
    Father, how could He have gone to Paradise (Luke 23:43)? At 
    what point did Jesus lose fellowship with the Father; and at 
    what point did He regain it? Nothing in the Bible indicates 
    either of these. To say that Jesus was abandoned by the Father 
    demands speculation as to when He was forsaken, and when He was 
    taken back into fellowship. Lack of passages on these points 
    should prevent us from such speculation.

         3. When we look at the various passages that speak of the 
    price paid by Jesus, they point to the blood shed by Jesus as a 
    sin-offering. Jesus is the lamb slain before the foundation of 
    the world (Rev. 13:8). It is with His precious blood that we 
    are redeemed (1 Pet. 1:18-19). It is through the shedding of 
    that blood that we are forgiven (Eph. 1:7). I believe this is 
    the import of the idea that Jesus was "made sin" (2 Cor. 5:21), 
    and that He became "a curse" for us. He was not literally sin, 
    but He was made a sin-offering. Jesus did not become guilty of 
    the sins anymore than the animals involved in the Old Testament 
    sacrifices became literally guilty. The shedding of the blood 
    became the means of forgiveness and the way by which the wrath 
    of God was appeased. In contrast to the animals, Jesus came to 
    do the will of God. "By this will we have been sanctified 
    through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all" 
    (Heb. 10:10). None of the passages indicate that the sacrifice 
    of Jesus included a spiritual separation from the Father, or a 
    forsaking of the Son by the Father. There is no question that 
    Jesus suffered spiritually and emotionally. But, it appears 
    that His greatest emotional pain was being experienced in the 
    garden before He actually went to the cross (Luke 22:44). These 
    passages show that the Father aided Him through His angels. 
    Jesus was in pain, even though not abandoned.

         4. Now, what about the phrase itself: "My God, My God, why 
    have You forsaken Me"? The key to the use of the phrase by 
    Jesus is to be found in its source. This phrase begins the 
    well-known Psalm 22. By quoting the first line of the Psalm, 
    Jesus was appropriating the message of the Psalm to Himself. A 
    look at this psalm shows that the one who uttered this phrase 
    was not literally forsaken by God. Note the following:

         a. The psalm can be broken down into two major parts: 1. 
    Forsaken by God (vv. 1-21), and 2. Delivered by God (vv. 
    22-31). The psalm begins with the desperate phrase quoted by 
    Jesus, but as it proceeds it expresses a victorious assurance 
    of deliverance.

         b. In the psalm, the quoted phrase does not intend to 
    express the idea that God has literally and actually forsaken 
    anyone. The forsaking is in appearance, not in reality. The 
    psalm fits quite well with all of the events that were 
    happening when Jesus was on the cross. We should not see the 
    words of Jesus on the cross in a vacuum, for other parts of the 
    psalm fit with the events of the cross; other prophecies are 
    fulfilled (e.g., vv. 7-8, 16-18). Verses 7-8 express exactly 
    what happened with those who mocked and sneered at Jesus. They 
    did not think that God would deliver Jesus because He appeared 
    so despised and smitten by God. It was the people who esteemed 
    Jesus to be smitten and afflicted by God (Isa. 53:4).

         c. The psalm shows that, in reality, the one uttering the 
    cry has been heard. Verse 22 marks a change from defeat to 
    victory. And notice verse 24: "For He has not despised nor 
    abhorred the affliction of the afflicted; nor has He hidden His 
    face from him; but when he cried to Him for help, He heard."

         d. Thus the phrase uttered by Jesus, taken from this 
    psalm, was not intended to convey the idea that the Father 
    actually forsook Him. It did convey the idea that He appeared 
    forsaken, but if the hearers knew the psalm from which Jesus 
    quoted, they would also need to think of the victory expressed 
    in the latter part of it. And I find it interesting that just 
    before Jesus "gave up His spirit," He said, "It is finished." 
    This statement coincides with the last verse of Psalm 22, 
    referring to the fact that God has "performed it," i.e., that 
    God has carried out justice and finished the work of providing 
    for salvation for all of mankind (vv. 25-31). In dying on the 
    cross, Jesus carried out this work. He finished the work that 
    God had promised and foretold so long before.

         5. When Jesus uttered the cry, "My God, My God, why have 
    You forsaken Me?" He was not asking for an answer. If we take 
    it to literally mean that God forsook Jesus, then we would also 
    have to take it to mean that Jesus didn't know why. He was 
    referring to Psalm 22 as the fulfillment of the prophecy. The 
    use of that phrase in the psalm itself does not lend anything 
    to the concept that Jesus literally was forsaken. Rather, it 
    points to the victorious nature of God's deliverance in the 
    midst of a time that appeared so dismal and forlorn. Jesus was 
    not forsaken. He was simply awaiting the deliverance that He 
    knew the Father would provide. Now if one uses Jesus' words on 
    the cross to say that the Father literally forsook Jesus, it 
    would need to be proved that Jesus intended those words to 
    convey something different than the way it is used in the 
    Psalm.

                   Is There An Application For Us?

         This is not just an academic exercise. The psalm, and its 
    use by Jesus, has a tremendous meaning for us as God's people. 
    What are some lessons we can learn and apply?

         1. When times are so difficult that it seems no one cares, 
    we have assurance that God is there for us. We are not promised 
    that everything on this earth will be free of difficulties, but 
    we are promised that God will never leave us nor forsake us 
    (Heb. 13:5-6). This psalm can be of great comfort to us when 
    things do not appear to be going too well. We can expect God's 
    deliverance.

         2. God hears and answers our cries. Sometimes we cry to 
    God out of despair and wonder if He is really listening. The 
    answer of this psalm is a resounding "yes." God hears and will 
    deliver, even if we feel alone.

         3. It is okay to express our desperate feelings to God. He 
    wants us to cast our cares upon Him (1 Pet. 5:6-7).

         4. Because of what God accomplished through Jesus, we are 
    blessed beyond all of our imaginations. So now we can praise 
    God, be satisfied, worship Him, and tell the coming generations 
    what marvelous works He has performed. Because of what God has 
    done, we have a great victory in Christ (Rom. 8:31ff).

         I realize that not everyone will agree with my brief 
    analysis of the phrase and the psalm. But I think that it is 
    very inadequate to just look at the phrase as Jesus was on the 
    cross and not give some consideration to the psalm from which 
    it comes. The psalm seems so entirely messianic that we cannot 
    overlook it in our interpretation of the phrase.

         I hope that these thoughts will encourage further study.
       ____________________________________________________

                  MYRTLE STREET CHURCH OF CHRIST
                        1022 Myrtle Street
                     Denham Springs, LA  70726
                          (225) 664-8208
                Sunday: 9:15 AM, 10:00 AM, 4:00 PM
                        Wednesday: 7:00 PM
           evangelist/editor: Tom Edwards (225) 667-4520
                   e-mail: tedwards@onemain.com      
           web site: http://home.onemain.com/~tedwards/go
       ____________________________________________________