____________________________________________________

                        THE GOSPEL OBSERVER

   "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations...teaching
   them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you
     always, even to the end of the age" (Matthew 28:19,20).
       ____________________________________________________

                         February 14, 1999
       ____________________________________________________

                       Must Be 21 to Attend
                        by Andy Diestelkamp

          It was October 31, 1998. My family and I had just 
     enjoyed some good food, fun and conversation with those of 
     like faith in their home.  After leaving their home we 
     traveled through the suburban sprawl of Chicagoland, 
     making our way on unfamiliar roads toward our next 
     destination. Even in areas without newly planted 
     subdivisions the roads connecting such communities can 
     become quite congested, so it was no surprise to suddenly 
     be confronted with bumper to bumper traffic.  Was it an 
     accident? No, apparently the slow-down was caused by 
     people turning left off of our two-lane into the parking lot 
     of a church building. How refreshing! The lot was packed 
     and more were trying to squeeze in. As we passed by the 
     entrance, we saw a sign that indicated that it was a 
     Lutheran church building. There was another sign that said 
     ``Haunted House.'' There was a zealous parking attendant 
     waving a flashlight and wearing an ugly mask. How 
     disgusting!

          Did no one see the flagrant incongruity of a church 
     using horrific scenes of evil and darkness to entertain 
     people? ``Something is wrong with this picture,'' is all I 
     could think at the moment. Upon reflection, however, 
     perhaps it was not that great a contradiction. Paul did warn 
     Timothy ``that in latter times some will depart from the 
     faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of 
     demons'' (1 Tim. 4:1).  Perhaps they were just celebrating 
     the source of their doctrines.  More likely, they were just 
     ``speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience 
     seared with a hot iron'' (1 Tim. 4:2). I wonder if that large 
     crowd returned the next morning (Sunday) to celebrate 
     Christ.

          After that frightening scene we arrived safely at the 
     home of some saints where we spent the night and arose the 
     next morning to go worship with others. A few blocks from 
     their home we passed a Roman Catholic church building. I 
     think the sign said, ``St. Paul's.'' There was another sign 
     next to it. It was one of those yellow rental signs with the 
     black moveable letters. It told of an upcoming event, but I 
     can't tell you what it said exactly because my eyes were 
     immediately drawn to the red letters which said, (I am not 
     making this up) ``MUST BE 21 TO ATTEND.'' Now, I know 
     those weren't the words of Jesus! Maybe they marked the 
     boundary of the ``red light district.'' They were advertising 
     their ``Casino Night.''

          What was going on in the Roman Catholic Church that 
     now one must be 21 to attend? Did no one see the flagrant 
     incongruity of a church using alcohol, gambling and who 
     knows what all to entertain people?  ``Something is wrong 
     with this picture,'' is all I could think at the moment. Upon 
     reflection, however, perhaps it was not that great a 
     contradiction. Paul did warn Timothy that ``perilous times 
     will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of 
     money, boasters, proud, blasphemers . . . unholy . . . 
     without self-control . . . lovers of pleasure rather than 
     lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its 
     power. And from such people turn away!'' (2 Tim. 3:1-5).

          Let's do that. Let's turn away; but we must turn away 
     from not only the people who promote such nonsense, but 
     from the carnal disposition that concocts such foolishness. 
     Only the gullible who are ``loaded down with sins'' and ``led 
     away by various lusts'' would fall for such swill. ``Men of 
     corrupt minds'' devise these schemes, ``but they will 
     progress no further, for their folly will be manifest to all'' 
     (2 Tim. 3:6-9).

          Most in the world, including many in the religious 
     world, mock those ``who carefully follow'' the ``doctrine, 
     manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, love, [and] 
     perseverance'' of Christ's apostles (2 Tim. 3:10). Let's not 
     let that deter us knowing that ``all who desire to live godly 
     in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.'' Sure ``evil men and 
     impostors will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being 
     deceived, but as for you, continue in the things which you 
     have learned and been assured of'' (2 Tim. 3:12-14).

                                   -- Via Think On These Things
          ___________________________________________

                  Three Answers to One Question
                       by Robert F. Turner

          Could one question be given three differing answers, 
     and all answers be correct? Seems unlikely doesn't it? Yet 
     this is the case in the N.T. book of Acts when the question, 
     ``What must I do?'' (to be saved) is asked.

          The expressed answer given to the Philippian jailer 
     was ``Believe!'' (See Acts 16:25-34 for full account.) Some 
     insist that this expressed reply is complete, and hence 
     salvation is by faith only. However, a consideration of the 
     expressed replies given this question on other occasions will 
     show the fallacy of such reasoning.

          When some of the Pentecost multitude asked, ``What 
     shall we do?'' they were told, ``Repent, and be baptized.'' 
     (See Acts 2:6-38-f. for details.) And when Saul asked what 
     to do he was directed to Ananias, who told him to ``Arise, 
     and be, baptized.'' (See Acts 9:1-18 22:6-16 for the record.)

          If only the expressed reply is to be considered we 
     would have to conclude that the jailer was saved by faith 
     alone, and that those on Pentecost were saved by 
     repentance and baptism (i.e., without any faith) and that 
     Saul was saved by baptism alone--without either faith or 
     repentance.  Of course none of these conclusions are valid.

                   Why Did The Answers Differ?

          Because the questions were asked by people in 
     different circumstances.  A man in Burnet may ask how far 
     is it to San Antonio?'' and be told, ``100 miles.'' In Marble 
     Falls this question would get a different answer. And in 
     Blanco, the same question would get a third, and different 
     answer. Yet all would be part of one great truth.

          There is no indication that the Philippian jailer had 
     either knowledge or faith in the Christian system; so he was 
     told to believe, and then ``they spake unto him the word of 
     the Lord.'' He repented, as indicated by washing their 
     stripes; and he was baptized, as stated in Acts 16:38.  Thus 
     he truly believed (vs. 34).

          But those on Pentecost heard the preaching of Christ 
     before they asked their question. The preaching ``pricked'' 
     their hearts; i.e., they believed. Then they were told 
     ``repent and be baptized.''

          And Saul (later called Paul) had already believed, and 
     had spent three days penitently praying, when he was told, 
     ``Arise and be baptized, and wash away thy sins.''

                        Where Are You??

          Your status or condition before God must be 
     considered in answering your question, ``What must I do?'' 
     The Lord will save ``all who will obey'' (Heb. 5:9) and has 
     given one gospel to all (Gal. 1:8 Rom. 2:11).  Have you 
     proven your faith by full and complete obedience to His 
     will?
                           -- Via Plain Talk, February 1964
          ___________________________________________

                     Examples Can Authorize
                        by Tracy Schell
 
          Do we need authority for all that we believe and 
     practice? May we speak where the Bible does not speak? Has 
     God given us all the information we need to worship and 
     please him, or has he left that up to our discretion?  
     Assuming you believe the Bible is the divinely inspired word 
     of God, let's take a look and see what we can learn.

          ``If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of 
     God'' (1 Peter 4:11).

          We may not substitute the oracles of man for those of 
     God, as people are apt to do. There seems to constantly be 
     in man the desire to circumvent the word of God and not do 
     things his way!

          One way people attempt to get out of doing God's will 
     is by dismissing half of his holy word by claiming it's not 
     essential because it doesn't contain a ``command.'' Does this 
     mean unless a passage says, ``go'' or ``do'' or has some 
     other action verb in it, that the passages cannot be used 
     for doctrine?

          ``All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is 
     profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for 
     instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be 
     perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works'' (2 
     Timothy 3:16-17).

          The inspired scripture has a wide variety of uses in 
     instructing the man of God. Note that we are not told that 
     any scripture is non-essential or not profitable for doctrine.

          On the question of when to partake of the Lord's 
     Supper, some say you can partake any day of the week 
     because Jesus' only comment to his disciples was, ``as often 
     as ye..." (1 Corinthians 11:26). But the question of when is 
     given to us quite clearly:

          ``And upon the first day of the week, when the 
     disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto 
     them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his 
     speech until midnight'' (Acts 20:7).

          While this clearly answers the question of when in my 
     mind, there are some that say this is merely the recording 
     of an event and that it carries with it no other meaning. A 
     brief review of principles of hermeneutics is in order.

          Approved apostolic examples and necessary 
     implications are just as compelling and instructive as 
     express commands. They partook of the supper in Troas on 
     the first day of the week. We have a clear and 
     unquestionably approved example. We have no other 
     historical record in scripture about when they took the 
     supper. If we follow their example, we are on unquestionably 
     safe ground.

          The implication of the passage is that, since they were 
     gathered to break bread on the first day, which is also the 
     day on which we know there is an express command to lay 
     by in store (I Corinthians 16:2), that this was their practice. 
     It is not said that ``upon the first day of the week, because 
     Paul was there...." Rather, it was on the day on which they 
     gathered to break bread that Paul came and preached to 
     them.

          My brethren, do not be deceived by perverted 
     teaching that contradicts the obvious. Instead, heed Paul's 
     warning to the Galatians:

          ``I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that 
     called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 
     Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, 
     and would pervert the gospel of Christ.  But though we, or 
     an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you 
     than that which we have preached unto you, let him be 
     accursed.  As we said before, so say I now again, If any 
     man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have 
     received, let him be accursed'' (Galatians 1:6-9).

          Yes, we need authority because we are required to 
     speak as the oracles of God. We have authority of 
     communing on the first day of the week, and are on safe, 
     apostolic ground to urge the practice on all.

          -- Via The Bulletin of the North Courtenay church of 
     Christ,  February 7, 1999
          ___________________________________________

                          NEWS & NOTES

          Carol Music has requested prayer for her brother Dan 
     Hamm, who was recently hospitalized for a heart attack. He 
     has been undergoing testing to determine the cause.

          Let us also be praying for my landlord, Ken Kazee. He 
     is now in the process of going through several tests that 
     will lead to his second hip-replacement, which has been 
     needful for some time now.

          John Pitman and his wife Lou are away in Charleston, 
     West Virginia, today, where John will be preaching for the 
     Daugherty Street church of Christ.

          Rick Fleeman did a fine job in preaching for us last 
     Sunday night.  His topic was ``Intercession,'' which dealt 
     with various examples of God and man carrying this out.
             ________________________________________
                            Tri-State                            
                        CHURCH OF CHRIST                         
         1314 Montgomery Avenue, Ashland, Kentucky 41101        
                  Sunday: 10:00 A.M. Bible class                 
                          10:50 A.M. Worship                     
                           6:30 P.M. Worship                     
                Wednesday: 7:30 P.M. Bible study                 
        evangelist/editor: Tom Edwards (606) 325-9742            
                   e-mail: tedwards@zoomnet.net  
 Gospel Observer web site: http://www.zoomnet.net/~tedwards/go
             ________________________________________